Josh Moore
Joshua Moore is a legal‑technology practitioner and solutions consulting leader who helps corporate legal teams understand, evaluate, and implement modern legal tech. He created CorporateLegal.tech as a resource for Legal Operations and General Counsel looking for clear, practical guidance in a crowded and often confusing technology landscape.
About Joshua Moore
Joshua Moore is a legal‑technology practitioner and solutions consulting leader who has spent his career helping corporate legal departments, law firms, and public agencies evaluate, implement, and scale modern legal tech. His work spans workflow automation, AI adoption, document management, labor costing, benchmarking, and legal operations strategy across both enterprise and public‑sector environments.
Joshua has led Solutions Consulting and Solutions Engineering teams at organizations including Checkbox, TrueComp, NetDocuments, and WeWork. Across these roles, he has worked directly with Legal Operations leaders, GCs, and cross‑functional stakeholders to design practical frameworks for intake, automation, process improvement, and technology selection. He has also contributed thought leadership across ILTA, CLOC, ACC, Consero, and Legal Operators.
He created CorporateLegal.tech as a neutral, practical resource for legal teams who want clarity in a crowded and often confusing technology landscape. The site reflects the patterns, evaluation criteria, and real‑world lessons he’s seen consistently help legal teams choose tools that genuinely improve outcomes — without vendor bias or marketing noise.
CorporateLegal.tech is where Joshua shares what he’s learned so legal leaders can make confident, informed decisions about the technology that supports their work.
Josh Moore
Your law firms are using AI on your matters. That's good. What's less good is that most outside counsel guidelines say nothing about it, which means the firm decides how AI is disclosed, billed, and priced. This template gives you a ready-to-adapt AI addendum for your OCGs, plus tips for rolling it out without starting a war with your panel.
Legal departments are excellent at starting AI pilots and terrible at finishing them. The pilot runs, a few enthusiasts love it, the rest never log in, and six months later nobody can say whether it worked. This 90-day plan fixes that with defined success criteria up front, weekly checkpoints, and a real go/no-go decision at the end.
Most AI policies fail for one reason: nobody reads them. They're twelve pages long, written for lawyers, and buried on an intranet page last updated in 2024. This template does the opposite. It fits on one page, uses plain English, and covers what actually matters in 2026: approved tools, off-limits data, privilege, transparency, and who to ask.
Every legal AI demo looks amazing. That's the problem. Without a consistent scorecard, the vendor with the slickest presenter wins, and you find out about the pricing model, the data retention terms, and the missing integration after signature. This template gives you 40 questions across seven categories, a weighting model, and a simple scoring scale, so every vendor gets the same exam.
The CFO wants to know which vendor contracts auto-renew next quarter. The CISO wants every agreement with a 24-hour breach notice clause. The board wants to know your exposure to a supplier that just went under. And your contracts live in shared drives, email attachments, and a CLM nobody finished migrating. AI contract intelligence has finally made this fixable, but only if you approach it the right way.