Josh Moore
Joshua Moore is a legal‑technology practitioner and solutions consulting leader who helps corporate legal teams understand, evaluate, and implement modern legal tech. He created CorporateLegal.tech as a resource for Legal Operations and General Counsel looking for clear, practical guidance in a crowded and often confusing technology landscape.
About Joshua Moore
Joshua Moore is a legal‑technology practitioner and solutions consulting leader who has spent his career helping corporate legal departments, law firms, and public agencies evaluate, implement, and scale modern legal tech. His work spans workflow automation, AI adoption, document management, labor costing, benchmarking, and legal operations strategy across both enterprise and public‑sector environments.
Joshua has led Solutions Consulting and Solutions Engineering teams at organizations including Checkbox, TrueComp, NetDocuments, and WeWork. Across these roles, he has worked directly with Legal Operations leaders, GCs, and cross‑functional stakeholders to design practical frameworks for intake, automation, process improvement, and technology selection. He has also contributed thought leadership across ILTA, CLOC, ACC, Consero, and Legal Operators.
He created CorporateLegal.tech as a neutral, practical resource for legal teams who want clarity in a crowded and often confusing technology landscape. The site reflects the patterns, evaluation criteria, and real‑world lessons he’s seen consistently help legal teams choose tools that genuinely improve outcomes — without vendor bias or marketing noise.
CorporateLegal.tech is where Joshua shares what he’s learned so legal leaders can make confident, informed decisions about the technology that supports their work.
Josh Moore
Last week AT&T named OpenAI a design partner for its in-house legal agency, and BMW rolled out legal AI across its legal department. It's tempting to file that under "nice for them." Don't. Most of what makes these programs work has nothing to do with budget or a famous AI lab, and you can start copying it on Monday.
A flat-fee contract review from $500. Contracts returned the same day through Slack. This week's AI-native law firm headlines read like a list of everything in-house teams have asked outside counsel for since the 1980s. Here are seven hot takes on why these startups matter even if you never hire one, and what your NDA queue should learn from them.
Three legal tech acquisitions landed in a single week, and each came with reassuring words about continuity. Your department's job is to check those words against your contract. This template gives you a 30-day plan: triage, a seven-clause contract review, vendor questions you can copy and paste, and a Green/Yellow/Red scorecard that ends in a decision.
Relativity's CEO confirmed this week that the 2028 deadline for its on-premises product still stands: starting January 1, 2028, new matters go to the cloud. Many legal departments don't know which platform their review data actually sits on. That's the real problem, and with about 15 months to go, it's very fixable. Here's the diagnosis and a four-step plan.
The first federal appeals court ruling on fair use and AI training isn't about chatbots. It's about Westlaw headnotes. The opinion is still sealed and ROSS says it's headed to the Supreme Court, but the case already raises questions every legal department should ask its AI vendors. Here are five practical lessons, from training-data provenance to the IP indemnity you'll hopefully never need.