Josh Moore
Joshua Moore is a legal‑technology practitioner and solutions consulting leader who helps corporate legal teams understand, evaluate, and implement modern legal tech. He created CorporateLegal.tech as a resource for Legal Operations and General Counsel looking for clear, practical guidance in a crowded and often confusing technology landscape.
About Joshua Moore
Joshua Moore is a legal‑technology practitioner and solutions consulting leader who has spent his career helping corporate legal departments, law firms, and public agencies evaluate, implement, and scale modern legal tech. His work spans workflow automation, AI adoption, document management, labor costing, benchmarking, and legal operations strategy across both enterprise and public‑sector environments.
Joshua has led Solutions Consulting and Solutions Engineering teams at organizations including Checkbox, TrueComp, NetDocuments, and WeWork. Across these roles, he has worked directly with Legal Operations leaders, GCs, and cross‑functional stakeholders to design practical frameworks for intake, automation, process improvement, and technology selection. He has also contributed thought leadership across ILTA, CLOC, ACC, Consero, and Legal Operators.
He created CorporateLegal.tech as a neutral, practical resource for legal teams who want clarity in a crowded and often confusing technology landscape. The site reflects the patterns, evaluation criteria, and real‑world lessons he’s seen consistently help legal teams choose tools that genuinely improve outcomes — without vendor bias or marketing noise.
CorporateLegal.tech is where Joshua shares what he’s learned so legal leaders can make confident, informed decisions about the technology that supports their work.
Josh Moore
August is supposed to be quiet. Not this year. The EU's AI transparency rules went live, the big legal vendors started training their own models, Google joined the legal AI race, and ILTACON drew a record crowd that left one veteran observer asking whether we'd hit peak legal tech. Here's what happened, with hindsight.
July was the month legal AI's economics showed up on the bill. Usage exploded, vendors started rethinking how they charge, and clients started asking who gets the savings. It was also the month the agent conversation turned from what agents can do to how you stop them doing the wrong thing. Here's the recap, with a few months of hindsight.
June delivered a lesson most legal teams hadn't planned for: the AI model behind your tools can be switched off overnight, for everyone, by a government letter. It was also the month courts split on whether executives' AI chats are discoverable, and the month AI-citation sanctions graduated from fines to suspensions. Here's the recap, with hindsight.
If April was the month AI moved into Word, May was the month it came looking for in-house legal specifically. A frontier AI company shipped plugins named after in-house practice areas, every major vendor rebranded its assistant as an agent, and the two scariest AI compliance deadlines both moved. Here's what happened, and what it means now.
April was the month legal AI stopped living in a separate browser tab and moved into the software lawyers actually open every morning: Microsoft Word. It was also the month an elite law firm apologized to a federal judge for AI-hallucinated citations, and the month two big AI regulations looked set in stone right up until they didn't. Here's what happened, and what it looks like now.